Search for: "Br. C. v. Be. C." Results 101 - 120 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
Greenpeace and the patent system share the same objective -- world changeA week and a half ago, the IPKat's Tuesday Tiddlywinks feature contained a reader's request to know what actually has happened to the controversial human embryonic stem-cell patent that was the subject of a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-34/10 Brüstle v Greenpeace. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:42 am by Jani
The interpretation of the Article in question hinges heavily, as discussed by the Attorney General, on the ECJ's earlier decision in Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace, where the Court saw that "...any human ovum must, as soon as fertilised, be regarded as a ‘human embryo’ within the meaning and for the purposes of the application of Article... since that fertilisation is such as to commence the process of development of a human being". [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:21 am by JR Chaves
La misma que según célebre valoración:” devoró a sus hijos” pues comportó sacrificios, sangre y traición de numerosos revolucionarios que la impulsaron entre 1789 y 1794 (Danton, Desmoulins, Madam Roland, el malvado Robespierre,etcétera). [read post]