Search for: "C. Davis v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 1,451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
Unlike the position in some of the State Supreme Courts,[2] leave to serve outside Australia[3] was required before service (FCR r 10.43(2)). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Elaine Hou
Circuit Review—Reviewed remains one of N&C‘s most important popular and important series, so special thanks to those contributors (Aimee Brown, Seth Davis, Thomas Griffith, Hyland Hunt, Aaron Nielson, and Haley Proctor). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm by Samuel Bray
But A's case is not a judgment in C's case; A's remedy is not a remedy for C (see, e.g., Gill v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The judgments in question are these: BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87; [2022] 1 WLR 1349 (1 November 2021) A v M [2021] EWFC 89; [2022] 1 FCR 445 (9 November 2021) Aylward-Davies v Chesterman [2022] EWFC 4; [2022] 2 FCR 541 (4 February 2022) Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30; [2022] 2 FCR 712 (12 April 2022) XZ v YZ [2022] EWFC 49 (20 May 2022) (this being the decision granting an interim RRO in the case later reported as Gallagher v… [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Professor Cheng may have over-generalized in stating that judges are epistemically incompetent to make substantive expert determinations. [read post]