Search for: "CTS Construction Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 1,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 7:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ct.831, 841 (2015).Claim construction seeks to ascribe the meaning to aclaim term as understood by a person of ordinary skill inthe art at the time of invention. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:51 am
In the nonsensical construction, a fired employee received loan forgiveness while the employee who quit kept his obligation. [read post]
12 May 2012, 8:49 am
"Many individuals are under the misconception that asbestos containing construction materials were only sold to industrial and large construction projects. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:28 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals recently clarified several aspects of the Protection of Underground Facilities Act (MCL 460.701) (the MISS DIG Act).In SBC v J T Crawford, Inc, ___ Mich App ___ (Mich Ct App, Nov 27, 2007), a case of first impression, the Court held --that pile driving is a construction activity subject to the MISS DIG Act,that the excavation contractor, but not the pile driving subcontractor, was required to contact MISS DIG, butthe pile driving subcontractor… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:47 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Oct. 27, 2009), FaulknerUSA, LP (Faulkner) is the general contractor at a construction project; United Forming, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:42 pm
Site Plan, its inclusion of [the Landowner's] rubble landfill in the [County’s] Solid Waste Management Plan (“SWMP”), the official assurances it gave to [the Landowner] that construction could proceed, and [Landowner's] substantial expenditures made in good faith reliance upon such assurances. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:24 am
Ct., New York Co., decided 10/17/2008) Leeco Construction performed work for Roebling Court Condominiums that resulted in some water damage. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 6:27 am
This was the recent ruling of the Michigan Supreme Court in Liss v Lewiston-Richards, Inc, 478 Mich 203; 732 NW2d 514 (Mich Sup Ct, June 6, 2007).In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court overruled two earlier decisions of the Michigan Court of Appeals -- Forton v Laszar, 239 Mich App 711, 609 NW2d 850 (2000), and Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg Co, Inc v Dailey, 266 Mich App 545, 701 NW2d 749 (2005) -- which had permitted homeowners to sue home builders under the… [read post]