Search for: "Cancel v. City of Providence" Results 101 - 120 of 428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
A tenured employee who resigns from his or her position and is subsequently reemployed by his or her former employer in the same title is not automatically entitled to tenure in the positionSpringer v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 1:08 am by Lindsey Meuser Rowland
City of Blaine and League of Minnesota Cities, click on the link below. http://www.mncourts.gov/SupremeCourt/OralArgumentWebcasts/ArgumentDetail.aspx? [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
He would be meeting the CEOs of Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland in the coming weeks to ensure that abortion services could be provided. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Frank Cranmer
Though it had gathered signatures and submitted a petition to the Pamplona City Council to cancel the exhibition, when the Council refused to do so, it did not challenge that decision by bringing contentious administrative proceedings as provided for in the Spanish legal system [28]. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:21 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Liptak (RLUIPA) Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:54 am
Because the “Free Speech Clause . . . does not regulate government speech,” Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council, heard 13 – 14 June 2012. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
Citing Engoren v County of Nassau, 163 AD2d 520, leave to appeal denied 77 NY2d 805, the court said that Section 63(1) provides job security to a permanent employee who is transferred or promoted to a position in which he or she is required to serve, but does not satisfactorily complete, a probationary period. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:40 am by Dennis Crouch
These review proceedings provide an alternative forum for third-parties (usually accused infringers) to challenge patent validity. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Important questions that deserve much more attention.So, too, does the last topic I will mention that we discussed—the question of when the costs of providing security for controversial speaker events justifies the cancellation or termination of the event. [read post]