Search for: "Cassidy v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
Bill Cassidy, R-La., to reinstate the federal flood insurance premium subsidies ended by Biggert-Waters. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
District Court (also in Maryland, as it happens) threw out the indictment in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 In Alexander v Cassidy, the Court of Appeals is to address the defendants’ immunity claims, and in People v Hill, the Court of Appeals is to consider the case as on leave granted. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:22 am by John Day
Part V provides an overview of the growing field of bed bug litigation. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, 131 S.Ct. 2729 (2011)), videotaping animal cruelty (United States v. [read post]