Search for: "Cheek v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:30 pm
Cheek v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:21 pm
In a recent case involving a constitutional challenge to seizing a person's DNA without his consent, the United States Supreme Judicial Court, in Maryland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
I focus here only on the Court’s invalidation of Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
It was evident in this week’s hearing that the United States national security apparatus remains heavily focused upon counterterrorism. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:36 am
Under Cheek v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Maryland v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 1:55 pm
Privacy rights were outweighed by law enforcement interests in the United States Supreme Court's June 3rd ruling in Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
Static Control Components, in which it will consider who has the right to bring a false advertising claim under the federal Lanham Act; and United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:15 pm
King, a case that was then only pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:41 am
On June 3, 2013, the United States Supreme Court in Maryland v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Certainly worthy of output from the Muttley Dastardly LLP *Psyops* unit. ) ‘THE TIDE MAY FLOOD LAW FIRMS, BUT I REMAIN UNCONVINCED THAT IT WILL ENGULF THE BAR’ Legal Cheek reports… Enjoy the sun and the bank holiday Best, as always Charon [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Certainly worthy of output from the Muttley Dastardly LLP *Psyops* unit. ) ‘THE TIDE MAY FLOOD LAW FIRMS, BUT I REMAIN UNCONVINCED THAT IT WILL ENGULF THE BAR’ Legal Cheek reports… Enjoy the sun and the bank holiday Best, as always Charon [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:08 pm
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:THE ITSY BITSY TEENY WEENY BIKINI .........Judge Fred Biery, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, has become something of a rock star these past few years.Back in 2008, ATL (Above The Law) bestowed their coveted Judge of the Day Award. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
Unknown: I thought Althouse's original post was a tounge on cheek [sic] reference to how we just moved on after the Supreme Court blessed us with Roe v Wade. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:59 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
They were disproportionately represented among tax protestors in earlier periods, and an airline pilot played the central role in one of the leading tax cases, Cheek v. [read post]
