Search for: "City of Fort Worth v. United States"
Results 101 - 119
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Click Here Cory King settles with state on feedlot charges. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:06 am
If you live in Weatherford, Texas, Arlington, Grand Prairie, or the Dallas - Fort Worth area, and you sue an insurance company, how do you know you won't have to travel to Delaware or some other state to fight the lawsuit? [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
The crossing, at the Upper Lars checkpoint in the Caucasus mountains, has been closed since 2006, when relations began growing tense, in part because of efforts by the Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, to align himself more closely with the United States. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:19 pm
City of Fort Worth, 2009 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
Like many people in Dallas, Fort Worth, and surrounding cities and counties Khan was a voluntary participant in a plan provided by his employer. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Fort Worth Bank & Trust, 478 U.S., 995-96, n. 3 (plurality opinion). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
Fort Worth Bank & Trust, 487 U. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property
'In re AOL' Formula Cited in Order That YouTube Pay ASCAP $1.61 Million Interim Fees for Video Use
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
City of Syracuse, No. 07-4019 (2d Cir. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 1:56 pm
According to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth in Adams v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Finally, in an effort to strengthen states’ abilities to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing of plans, effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, MIPPA requires plans to: use only agents and brokers licensed under state law; abide by state appointment laws; report any agent terminations to the state; and comply with state requests for information regarding the performance of agents, brokers, and… [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
Francis of Indiana Cougars (Fort Wayne, 13-0) (1) v. [read post]
