Search for: "Com. v. Sales, S."
Results 101 - 120
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2017, 11:46 am
Concepts Com., 2017 WL 5441831 (D.P.R. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
So let’s start again. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
EMA, which tests the constitutionality of California’s law prohibiting sales of violent video games to minors. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:16 am
Com. de Equip. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
He quoted the Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgment in Blomqvist v Rolex C-98/13 [EU: C: 2014:55] and stated that this ruling is clear authority for the proposition that “the sale of goods under a sign by a foreign website to a consumer in the United Kingdom or the European Union constitutes use of the sign in the relevant territory, and that this is so even if there is no antecedent listing, offer for sale or adverts targeting consumers in… [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm
Arris Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
This would put Apple and Samsung at a com- petitive disadvantage compared to their current position. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:47 am
This week’s Exhibit “A” is the defendant in State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:04 am
” Jazz Photo Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am
Entertainment Merchants Assn., concerning California’s law on restricting sales of violent video games to minors. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
And he did, generating sales of $26.5 million in 2006, his last year. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
In the first, the court held that McCoy’s various drug-related charges didn’t merge, but after State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:38 am
Nike alleges that defendants are “manufacturing, distributing, offering for sale, and/or selling the Nike Trademarks in the form of counterfeit shoes bearing exact copies or colorable imitations of the Nike Trademarks,” including Nike’s NIKE, SWOOSH DESIGN, NIKE AIR, AIR JORDAN, and JUST DO IT registered trademarks.Nike also alleges it sent cease-and-desist letters demanding that defendants stop making sales, but… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm
& Com. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
That’s the result for the defendant in State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:23 am
Peak [1] and UMG v MP3.com [2] have held that a copy is a duplication of a copyrighted work. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
DS went after 190 .com domain names that were registered in Zuccarini's name. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Last year, in McDonald v. [read post]
