Search for: "Cooper v. County Board of Review of Grant County"
Results 101 - 120
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
In rejecting the appellants arguments that the functional equivalent documents failed to analyze the environmental and economic impacts associated with dredging, the court noted that the BPA specifically calls for the cooperation of various landowners and the Regional Board to cooperate in negotiating and executing a memorandum of agreement on how the TMDL for lake sediment should be implemented. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Madison,[1]5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)· Cooper v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Petitioner filed a grievance and the Board of Assessment Review for the Town of Catskill upheld the assessor’s denial of the exemption. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
In 2009, the plaintiffs filed an action against the Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County which was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice three years later in light of the Supreme Court's decision in "Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:35 am
Pierce County. 92 Wn. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Charlotte‑Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971), (the famous school busing decision), Griggs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
The headliner of that Conference is National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
In Muscarello v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
., U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm
Review Granted Duran v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
” Today’s granted cases: Arizona v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Cooper (whether the Federal Privacy Act includes damages for mental and emotional distress), while Michael Dimino previews Setser v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The Board denied her petition for review as untimely filed, finding no credible medical evidence regarding her condition. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
At that Conference, they will select cases for review from the summer lists. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Nuvasive, Inc., et. al (Docket Report) TransData – In smart meter patent suit TransData focuses antennae on Texas utility: TransData v Denton County Electric Cooperative (Green Patent Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court Maryland: Guess confusion isn’t such a big deal: Chattery Interanational v. [read post]
