Search for: "Coughlin v. Coughlin" Results 101 - 120 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Walk on the Wild Side 2009 Host Committee Myles Amend and Marc Thomas Jack and Ian Archer Watters Michael Bayer and Miguel Marzullo Elisabeth Benjamin and Daniel Coughlin Gregory Boroff and Thomas Sodano Kris Bungay and Jim O'Sullivan John Caraccioli and Jeff Appel Dan Carlson Gregg Cartagine and Reed Chaikin Matt Chin Mark Corpron and Joseph Vallo Merle Cunningham and Kevin Absec Denise Cuttita and Diane Westerback Mickey Dobbs Daniel Dokos Richard Dworkin … [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm by The JAG HUNTER
v=1mDr5j4GQUo Similarly, US soldiers mentioned the poor treatment and virtual slavery of Women in Afghan society, and how they found such practices repugnant. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm by The JAG HUNTER
v=1mDr5j4GQUo Similarly, US soldiers mentioned the poor treatment and virtual slavery of Women in Afghan society, and how they found such practices repugnant. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm by The JAG HUNTER
v=1mDr5j4GQUo Similarly, US soldiers mentioned the poor treatment and virtual slavery of Women in Afghan society, and how they found such practices repugnant. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 4:52 am
When the request was denied, the individual sued, claiming his resignation had been obtained under duress and thus was void.The Court of Appeals ruled that where an appointing authority has the right, if not the duty, to take disciplinary action against an individual, "it was not duress to threaten to do what one had the legal right to do" [Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643]. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
”Noting that paragraph 9 of the PBA’s petition seeking to compel arbitration itself confirm that the parties understood that the DEP would be a probationary period, the Appellate Division said that “This clear meaning and understanding of the parties is in complete harmony with the meaning and use of DEPs in similar reported cases,” citing Matter of Miller v Coughlin, 59 NY2d 490, 493; and Matter of McGough v State of New York, 243 AD2d 983, 983-984… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:11 am
Attempting to vacate a consent agreement resolving an administrative proceedingMatter of Kirk v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:17 am
Employee’s resignation rescinded based on Supreme Court's finding that it was coercedMiller v New York City Dept. of Education, 2010 NY Slip Op 31210(U), May 11, 2010, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Jane S. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
When the request was denied, the individual sued, claiming his resignation had been obtained under duress and thus was void.The Court of Appeals ruled that where an appointing authority has the right, if not the duty, to take disciplinary action against an individual, "it was not duress to threaten to do what one had the legal right to do" [Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643]. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” NYPPL Comment: On the issue of coercion in connection with an appointing authority’s threatening disciplinary action if the employee does not resign from his or her position, the Court of Appeals has held that threatening to do what the appointing authority had a right to do -- i.e., file disciplinary charges -- did not constitute coercion so as to make the resignation involuntary [Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643]. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Identification of the records demanded.Noting that Kirsch and Starvaggi had "reasonably described" the requested emails thus enabling the Board to identify and produce the records, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, held that the Board "cannot evade the broad disclosure provisions of [the] statute . . . upon the naked allegation that the request will require review of thousands of records. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Coughlin (Tribal sovereign immunity from suit under the Bankruptcy Code) One petition for certiorari was filed on 3/28/23: Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. [read post]