Search for: "Coughlin v. Coughlin"
Results 101 - 120
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2016, 3:02 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
” [Coughlin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:00 am
”* Concerning the issue obtaining an "involuntary resignation," in Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeals pointed out that threatening to do what the appointing authority had a right to do -- in this instance filing disciplinary charges against the employee if the employee did not submit his resignation from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make the resignation involuntary. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
The District Court cited the Ninth Circuit decision Coughlin v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
Coughlin answered the complaint.Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:40 am
Partnership v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
Coughlin, OICU LTD., and OICU Investments Corp. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
In Katz v Siroty, the defendant appealed an order denying his motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:58 pm
The facts in Blake v Massachusetts Mut. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
The style of the case is Hamilton Properties v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the employee was told that if he did not submit his resignation immediately he would be served with disciplinary charges. [read post]
