Search for: "Crystal Communications Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2013, 11:30 pm by Dan Flynn
“We’ve been reaching out some,” says April Ward, LGMA’s communications director who is based in Sacramento. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Building #19, Inc., No. 12-1659, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 85929  (1st Cir. 2013) “[A] trademark holder has no right to police ‘unnecessary’ use of its mark. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
Pembroke Real Estate Inc., a real estate company wished to remove and relocate a sculpture from a Boston park. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm by WIMS
Countries, communities and companies worldwide announced hundreds of individual commitments to instigate real change - irrespective of any United Nations document. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:50 am by Brandon Kain
LeBel J. agreed with the lower courts’ reasoning that “the balance of fairness favours litigation in Ontario” because it would “be unfair to prevent Lord Black from suing in the community in which his reputation was established, whereas there would be no unfairness to the appellants if the actions were to proceed in Ontario because it would have been reasonably foreseeable to them that posting the impugned statements on the internet and targeting the Canadian media… [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The defendant, Crystal Cox, subsequently sought the protection of Oregon’s media shield law, a refuge which was denied her by the judge. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:53 am by Brennan W. Bolt
"CWA Members Give Strike Authorization To Union Leaders as Bargaining Continues" -- BNA (paid) Members of the Communications Workers of America voted by more than 93 percent among those who cast ballots to give authorization to union executive board members to call strikes if collective bargaining contracts cannot be reached with AT&T Inc., the union announced March 31. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Mark Bennett
Sequence, Inc. is part of the solution too, by exposing the attacks on Kevin Padrick, and shining a light on Cox’s widespread extortion scheme, so is Philly Law Blog, and before any of the law blogger community jumped on the bandwagon, Salty Droid was out there all by himself, shining a little light — which is now accompanied by more and more lights. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:14 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,650,327 (the ‘327 patent), 6,816,145 (the ‘145 patent), and 5,717,881 (the ‘881 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego,… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:47 am by John L. Welch
The hearings [except for the third one, which will be held at the Crystal Gateway Marriott Hotel in Arlington, Virginia] will be held in the East Wing of the Madison Building, in Alexandria, Virginia. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:05 am by Chris Castle
No one in the creative community expects a market with zero piracy. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,650,327 (the ‘327 patent), 6,816,145 (the ‘145 patent), and 5,717,881 (the ‘881 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego,… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
Judge Wilkinson takes this opportunity to crystalize his concern: before “wading into” foreign affairs and national security, imposing potentially significant discovery on the intelligence community, and applying money damages (which Judge Wilkinson notes is only one type of remedy, not the only kind) to high-level government officials, shouldn’t the judiciary wait for an “express authorization . . . not an implication” from Congress? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,916,684 entitled WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK PROVIDING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MOBILE DEVICES AND ACCESS POINTS and owned by Harris Corporation. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,916,684 entitled WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK PROVIDING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MOBILE DEVICES AND ACCESS POINTS and owned by Harris Corporation. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am by Marie Louise
Stealth: “In sum, both experts had the opportunity to provide direct evidence…” (IPBiz)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Google and T-Mobile ask the ITC not to ban HTC’s Android devices as requested by Apple (FOSS Patents) Intel – Challenge to Intel data evaluation patent, among reexamination requests filed week of October 3, 2011 (WHDA) Intellectual Ventures – World’s leading patent troll sues Motorola over Android… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Further, providing more principles will crystallize the Advisory Panel’s vision and narrow the approp [read post]