Search for: "D. McDaniel"
Results 101 - 120
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Supp. 363 , 374 (D. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Supp. 363 , 374 (D. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
If any economists have written about this sort of thing, I'd love to hear about it. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
If any economists have written about this sort of thing, I'd love to hear about it. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
McDaniel, 824 F.2d 1380, 1396 (4th Cir. 1987). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:58 am
We’d prefer to see the roles of CEO and chairman split.” In two recent examples where Morningstar analysts gave Amgen (AMGN) and McKesson (MCK) D ratings for stewardship, the respective analysts both cited the dual role. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
Another former employee, Kelly McDaniel, who had also signed a waiver agreement, later joined the action. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
Another former employee, Kelly McDaniel, who had also signed a waiver agreement, later joined the action. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Citing McDaniel v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Supp. 1048, 1058, (D.D.C. 1987) (granting summary judgment against hospital strict liability claim under Fisher), aff’d in part & vacated in part on other grounds, 851 F.2d 437 (D.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Mo. 1999); McDaniel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Mo. 1999); McDaniel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Mo. 1999); McDaniel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Mo. 1999); McDaniel v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Supp. 1177, 1181 (D. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Supp. 2d 986, 992 (D. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:02 am
Eurith D. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
Cir. 2004) (citing In re McDaniel, 293 F.3d 1379, 1385-86 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
April 9, 1999); McDaniel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
First, the respondent cited passages from the above-mentioned Markman and Pappas decisions to argue that the petitioner was not authorized to seek a surcharge by the language of Section 1104-a (d) because the case did not involve a stock valuation. [read post]
