Search for: "DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, INC v. USA" Results 101 - 120 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am by Candace Cathey
Martin Luther King, Jr. at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:48 am by Gmlevine
V. and Velcro USA Inc. v. allinhosting.com/Andres Chavez, D2008-0864 (WIPO July 28, 2008) explained that “it would take an exceptional case to succeed where there was no malicious or exploitative intent directed at the complainant [or its trademark] at time of registration of the domain name. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert  In the Oracle v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Marie Louise
Apple v Samsung (PatLit) Metall auf Metall II – The curious case of free use and sampling (1709 Copyright Blog) Bundespatentgericht confirms no risk of confusion between iMove and IMOVIE (Class 46)   Netherlands Samsung loses Dutch case against Apple over 3G patents as court gives meaning to FRAND (FOSS Patents) (EPLAW)   Spain File-sharing admins jailed for linking to copyright works (TorrentFreak)   Sweden Stockholm District Court: Jail sentence for Pirate Bay… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 20, 2011), and the class action case, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Saab Cars USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
Maersk Contractors USA, Inc., 617 F. 3d 1296, 1305 (CA Fed. 2010); cf. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm by WIMS
When it comes to replacing imported oil, no other energy technology can match ethanol today. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) Raylon – Less-than-cost-of-defense settlements do not warrant Rule 11 sanctions when used to raise capital for litigation: Raylon, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm by Bexis
Endovascular Technologies, Inc., 119 Cal. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc., 467 F.3d 1370, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 522 F.3d 1299, 1305 (Fed. [read post]