Search for: "DOE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
No. 08 Civ. 7810 (LTS)(JCF).United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Zimmerman (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) District Court C D California: IsoHunt told to pull .torrent files offline, likely to close: Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:29 pm
The Zink et. al. study confirms that the California gnatcatcher is not a separate subspecies and does not exhibit ecological distinctiveness. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 9:31 pm
The complaint in Heller, et al., v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:04 pm
Mohammad, et al. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
(The Court took no action on Tuesday on a conditional cross-petition, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
(The Court took no action on Tuesday on a conditional cross-petition, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
Defendant in the underlying Columbian case, Ministerio deAmbiente y Desarrollo Sostenible et al could file a motion to quash the subpoenas ordered by the Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Zuckerberg et al.Decision Date: June 16, 2019 The United States District Court Northern District of California dismissed a First Amendment claim against Facebook. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:17 am
In a 20-page Memorandum of Decision in Joseph Farah et al. v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
Quranic Literacy Institute, et al. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:25 pm
., for a 30-day extension of the time to file the city's petition in the case of District of Columbia, et al., v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Horne, et al., v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:40 pm
This one does not have anything to do with the last recess appointments to the Board which are under challenge, but to the fact that Member Brian Hayes, did not participate in voting on the passage of the final rule.In Chamber of Commerce et al v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
The Chicago case, NRA, et al., v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
AL., 26A FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE § 5679 (1st ed.) [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
I argue that consumer confusion has to be considered in the second prong of the Rogers Test.See Twentieth Century Fox Tel., et al v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
I argue that consumer confusion has to be considered in the second prong of the Rogers Test.See Twentieth Century Fox Tel., et al v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:10 pm
In a challenge to that action, County of Rockland, New York, et al. v. [read post]
