Search for: "Day v Davis"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
” Anne Davis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:17 am
" The Supreme Court extended these Title VII hostile environment cases to the Title IX context in Davis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 2:04 pm
Thaler v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d at 442, 835 N.Y.S.2d 534, 867 N.E.2d 385; Davis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:19 am
Some excerpts from Sandmann v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If the MQD is a weak clear statement rule, then it only wins the day if the relevant statutory language is underdetermined (ambiguous, vague, etc.). [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
., Gerard v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Attorney General.[14] Obtaining approval within four days will be quite a feat.[15] Even if the issuer succeeds, it only gets a thirty-day reprieve from disclosing the incident. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
But even these two Justices were forced to address (and ultimately chose to embrace) Smiley, (its predecessor Davis v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
In some ways the case reflects the problem posed by Parkes QC in Hodges v Naish. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
However, in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
