Search for: "Democratic Party v. Board of Elections" Results 101 - 120 of 594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am by Peter Mahler
Defendants contend that the parties who drafted the shareholders’ agreement meant for each shareholder to have an equal voice on the board. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 8:21 pm
It includes an eight-factor test, set forth in the consent order, that boards of election are supposed to adhere to. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 7:17 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Anarchy is anathema to majorities of both major parties and inconsistent with democratic government. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:34 pm by Matt Cooper
The campaign originally filed a lawsuit in the Michigan Court of Claims, asserting that Michigan’s Secretary of State unlawfully failed to provide an opportunity for an election inspector of each political party to be present at each absent voter counting board. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Board of Education on the basis of "neutral principles. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
In the 2022 election, the Swedish Democrats surpassed the Moderates (M) in number of seats and became the second largest party in parliament and the largest party of the majority coalition. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
Marion County Election Board, Adam Littak has a timely column today in the NY Times titled "Fear but Few Facts in Debate on Voter I.D.'s. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:45 am by Andrew Hursh
Virginia State Board of Elections, should not control because of later legal developments, including the Bush v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
It happened to a large extent because the Democratic Party was taken over by an ideological cohort of people who—while happily accepting unions’ support and donations during elections—actively and passively allowed unions to wither away. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:18 am by Rick Hasen
  The Voting Wars details the bitter dispute over a 2008 case, Ohio Republican Party v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am by Patrick Maines
The answer to the first question is that it’s an election stunt meant to rally the Democratic “base,” while the answer to the second is that sponsorship of this amendment shows that when politicians fear for their own, or their party’s, chances at the ballot box, anything, even the trashing of the most important part of the Bill of Rights, is fair play. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Parties need not challenge on appeal everything a lower court has done but are free to focus on what they consider the most objectionable part(s) of a ruling. [read post]