Search for: "Department of Justice v. Spring" Results 101 - 120 of 589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am by Allan Blutstein
Every time I read footnote two of Justice Scalia’s dissent in Department of Justice v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 9:35 am by Aaron Mackey
This is why we need the California Department of Justice to bring San Bernardino authorities and other agencies across the state into compliance with CalECPA’s transparency mandates. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Supreme Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
Agency for International Development (USAID) and the State Department correctly identify governance as the cornerstone to changing the socioeconomic dynamics in the region and as fundamental to the overall success of the strategy. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
And Thompson has said he hopes to finish the investigation by the “early spring” of 2022. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
As described in more detail below, the leadership of each agency, in consultation with the White House and Justice Department, will ultimately decide which of those records to release. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
”[11] The Department of Justice filed a notice of appeal three days later and sought to stay the injunction pending such appeal.[12] The request for stay was denied by the Fifth Circuit and then by the Supreme Court in a summary order off the Court’s “shadow docket. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:10 am
" Schauer points out that the fact that the Constitution is written does not preclude expansive and flexible interpretations--noting that Chief Justice Marshall suggested as much in McCulloch v. [read post]