Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 101 - 120 of 12,148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 In deciding such immunity questions, the Court assumes that the statute in question does validly bind the defendant and that he violated it--just as it did in Fitzgerald, and just as it does in qualified immunity cases. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 7:02 am by Mavrick Law Firm
 One defendant was involved in acquiring the plaintiff’s database through misrepresentation and deceit, two defendants were involved in acquiring the plaintiff’s database through scraping attacks, and a fourth defendant implemented the stolen trade secret to generate profit. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch I was rereading the Supreme Court’s recent enablement decision of Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Monica Schreiber
Fowler: The other case I worked on in the spring of last year, as a full time student, is United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank the authors for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:40 am by Daniel Spiegel
The post Confidential Informants, Motions to Reveal Identity, and Discovery: Part I, Roviaro v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
Defendant knows what he is doing, and everyone else does too. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
  I will not trudge through that tortured poetry but rather jump to the most recent trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Howard Knopf
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(I should also point out that if, as some press reports indicate, the University of Maryland may be moving forward with disciplinary proceedings against any students, it does not help for the President to publicly say the episode that played out was a good example of “free speech and academic freedom. [read post]