Search for: "Doe v. General Hospital of District of Columbia" Results 101 - 120 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2013, 5:13 am by Susan Brenner
Doe No. 3, supra (quoting Columbia Ins. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:19 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
District Court for the Western District of Michigan dismissed Casias' lawsuit finding that the word “business” in the statute does not regulate private employment actions and that the MMMA "contains no language stating that it repeals the general rule of at-will employment in Michigan or that it otherwise limits the range of allowable private decisions by Michigan businesses. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Heidi Henson
In this regard, the disputed rule was distinguishable from the rulemaking upheld by the Supreme Court in American Hospital Assoc v NLRB. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:30 am by Mark Theodore
Recent decisions, one from the NLRB and one from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, are worth noting because they illustrate recurring themes under the NLRA.   [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:30 am by Mark Theodore
 Recent decisions, one from the NLRB and one from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, are worth noting because they illustrate recurring themes under the NLRA. [read post]
  The appellate court rejected the FTC’s argument that the Hospital Authority acted as a mere straw-man by citing City of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:42 am by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) refused to enforce a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decision that a hotel unlawfully suspended hospitality workers who engaged in a work stoppage. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:42 am by Kara M. Maciel
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) refused to enforce a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decision that a hotel unlawfully suspended hospitality workers who engaged in a work stoppage. [read post]