Search for: "Doe v. Holder" Results 101 - 120 of 6,679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  Before addressing the substance of the argument itself, it’s important to distinguish it from another, more draconian “non-self-execution” argument that no party is making but that has been prominent in some public discussions of the case—namely, that Section 3 does not apply to disqualify anyone from any office absent congressional legislation. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:44 am by Unknown
The Act, however, does not protect private offerings of debt securities, and the court affirmed that that was the case here. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
 And the LLC law does not prohibit an LLC’s use of equity-based compensation. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:56 am by Chris Castle
 But either way it does seem like this new new thing should start with a clean slate–and all accrued royalties should be paid. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
However, in the NCS Multistage Inc. v. [read post]