Search for: "Doe v. Phillips" Results 101 - 120 of 1,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 5:06 am
  Does that Tribunal have the power to order costs payable from a pension fund? [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm by Jason Mazzone
It comes as no surprise that the Supreme Court has refused to lift the Ninth Circuit's stay of Judge Virginia Phillips' injunction (which barred enforcement of Don't Ask, Don't Tell) in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The Appeal The “Times” does not, on this appeal, seek to challenge the fundamental parameters of the “responsible publication” defence – as clarified in Jameel. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The Appeal The “Times” does not, on this appeal, seek to challenge the fundamental parameters of the “responsible publication” defence – as clarified in Jameel. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:24 pm by Sme
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease*Razo v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:32 am by Sme
Phillips 66 Company (10th Cir., May 4, 2017) (affirming dismissal of discrimination claim under the ADA because Russell failed even to establish his prima facie case)MiscellaneousEdwards v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 1:28 pm by David Jacobson
In Morley & Ors v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] NSWCA 331 (discussed here) a full bench of the NSW Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the former CFO Phillip Morley and partly accepted the appeal by the former Secretary and General Counsel Peter Shafron. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, "[t]he law does not require that the information contain the most precise words or phrases most clearly expressing the charge, only that the sex crime and the factual basis therefor be sufficiently alleged" (People v Sylla, 7 Misc 3d 8, 10 [2d Dept 2005]). [read post]