Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California"
Results 101 - 120
of 312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in the case Regents of the University of California, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 413, 418; Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
Most recently in Regents of University of California v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Regents of the University of California (the DACA case). [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:05 am
Regents of the University of California (the DACA case). [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
Regents of the University of California, the Court must decide the fate of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration policy. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Regents of the University of California, which was alternately focused on the administrative-law wrinkles in the case and more sweeping sentiments about immigration law and policy. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:32 am
Regents of the University of California, Ilya Shapiro and I submitted an amicus brief on behalf of the Cato Institute and Professor Jeremy Rabkin. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:02 pm
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405.) [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Regents of the University of California The appointment of members of the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico in Aurelius The current interpretation of the Clean Water Act in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am
Regents of the University of California), and whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sex stereotyping (R.G. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
Regents of the University of California (and two other consolidated cases), the Supreme Court will consider whether the Trump administration’s decision to end President Barack Obama’s 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program — which enabled 800,000 immigrants brought to this country illegally as minors to remain and work here — is lawful or even judicially reviewable. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
