Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in New Doe Child #1 v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:33 am
On the other hand, if an applicant is using the name of a weekly comedy television show as a mark, “television broadcasting services” would not be appropriate because the mark does not serve to identify and distinguish the electrical transmission of the program. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Col. 1, ll. 26-29; col. 2,ll. 39-41. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 5:45 am
(See note 1, infra.) [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm
Does QOCS protection apply to DAs? [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm
GRAND VISION GAMING, LLC, TIMOTHY CARSON, and MERLE FRANK, and JOHN DOES 1-10. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
What if the return on that technology was $400:$1--for every $1 of government program money spent, the return in cost savings was $400? [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:39 am
Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(i) is therefore appropriate. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:09 pm
Justice Donald wrote at paragraph 41:[41] Granting an automatic exemption to recipients of employment or disability insurance suggests a more generous approach than was previously taken. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Originally posted 2017-04-10 11:00:41. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
The resolution is drawn from a draft model “say on pay” policy crafted by the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance (CCGG), which represents 41 investors managing over $1 trillion in assets. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
Even these recently extended exemptions – which simply recognize the reality that California employees and business representatives are not consumers and should not have the same extensive rights to get copies of or delete their data – were subject to a sunset of January 1, 2021, now extended to January 1, 2022. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
§4712(a)(1). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
There are several means by which to establish a parental relationship under the Act: (1) genetic contribution, N.J.S.A. 9:17-41; 4 (2) gestational primacy, i.e., giving birth, N.J.S.A. 9:17-41(a); or (3) adoption, N.J.S.A. 9:17-41(c). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
’836 patent col. 7 ll. 41–44. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
KNUT IP Management Ltd, on the other had contended an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:40 pm
P. 41(e)(1)-(5); After the Cunningham case - if the defendant satisfies the burden of going forward - the prosecutor must then show that the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Enbridge Pipelines Inc., 2017 SCC 41 [1] In this appeal and in its companion, Clyde River (Hamlet) v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
” 2019 01 10 order denying stay UPDATE (Background materials): 1 complaint 15 motion to dismiss count ii 18 response 19 reply 23 dct order granting 15 28 george motion for summary judgment 32 response 34 reply 40 us motion to stay 41 amended motion [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:43 am
Published: 10/7/2013 11:41 AM [read post]
