Search for: "Dow v. Jones"
Results 101 - 120
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 4:10 am
After today's decision, there are now three decisions in favour of eBay (UK, France and Belgium), one decision in favour of L'Oréal (Germany) and one decision (from Spain) still outstanding.According to a report by Kathy Sandler of Dow Jones Newswires, the court appears to have taken the view that the relevant European trade mark law provisions and the eCommerce Directive "were unclear, referring such issues to the European Court of Justice… [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:55 am
Federal prosecutors did not identify the companies involved, but other news sources identified at least some of them as JPMorgan Chase, ETrade, Scottrade, TDAmeritrade, Fidelity Investments, and Dow Jones. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:31 pm
See also Dow-Jones, earlier POL post. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Here's another good story by another hard worker, Lavonne Kuykendall of Dow Jones Newswires. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:58 am
Watson and City of Ontario v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:35 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am
(ii) Abuse of process As established in the case of Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, the Court is required to stop defamation proceedings which serve no legitimate purpose, i.e. whether a ‘real and substantial tort’ had been committed. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Maya Jackson Randall of Dow Jones Newswires (via NASDAQ) covers the Court’s refusal to review Bank of New York Mellon Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., the First Department affirmed dismissal of an investment adviser's claim that a Wall Street Journal reporter engaged in tortious conduct by obtaining information from employees bound by non-disclosure agreements (178 AD3d 572, 574 [1st Dep't 2019]). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:10 pm
Dow Jones. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
In In re Dow Corning Corporation, No. 95-20512, 2000 Bankr. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
See Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
The judge considered whether there had been a “real and substantial tort”, as required to serve defamation proceedings out of jurisdiction (Dow Jones & Co Inc. v Yousef Abdul Latif Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75). [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:01 am
Dow Jones and Co., 67 Ill.App.3d 869, 876 (1st Dist. 1978). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
The decision outlines an apparent variation on the Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] EWCA Civ 75) jurisdiction to dismiss a claim for abuse of process. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:18 pm
Judgment The defendant brought her application on three grounds: that the court had no jurisdiction to hear the claim because the claimant was engaged in so-called ‘libel tourism’, under the Defamation Act 2013, section 9; the claimant had no real prospect of showing the words complained of met the threshold for serious harm, under the Defamation Act 2013, section 1(1); and that the claim was an abuse of process, pursuant to Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] 2 WLR… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
KQED News outlines the issue in a brief radio clip (available here), while Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Inside Higher Ed, the San Francisco Chronicle, and Dow Jones Newswire (via NASDAQ) provide more detail. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm
* Dow Jones v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
In the light of this, it considered that Parliament’s choice to use the wording of “serious harm” could only have represented an intentional departure from the previous decisions in Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 74 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414. [read post]
