Search for: "Dress for Less, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2022, 7:47 am
WRB, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
Trade dress FTW! [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:39 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:00 pm
Flo Rida, whose real name is Tramar Dillard, and his production company, Strong Arm Productions brought suit against Celsius Holdings Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:10 am
” The mark is described as: "a three dimensional trade dress design of a package of the Applicant’s goods. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:55 pm
A copyright registration, if available, is easier and less expensive to obtain than a registered patent or trademark. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
Samara Brothers, Inc., which he wrote for a unanimous Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:40 am
However, the Supreme Court explained in 1985 that the courts are less likely to find fair use if the work was unpublished, Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:43 am
Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:15 am
One still has to distinguish this from recipes (discussed more here), and while they are much less likely to be protectable, shapes are a different matter altogether. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
In Grand Prospect Partners, LP, v Ross Dress for Less Inc., Ross was negotiating with a shopping center owner Porterville, in Tulare County. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:48 am
Drive less; live in smaller space; use less energy. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
Gibson Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm
LG Electronics USA, Inc., 2019 WL 8168069, No. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:00 pm
The district court denied most these claims, but nevertheless found that some of the statute's regulation of color and trade dress did violate the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
Fortune Dynamic, Inc., 2009 WL 2366439 (C.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:03 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., No. 16-2424, 2018 WL 1177669 (6th Cir. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 6:48 pm
As Observer.com indicates, “Something will surely tap into the superstitious of brides to be: How unlikely would it be to wear a dress inspired by a marriage that lasted less than three months? [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 1:14 pm
” The Federal Circuit reasoned that “consumers are more likely to remember and be impacted in their perceptions by third party uses within five years and less likely with respect to older uses. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 7:26 am
Dorman Products, Inc. v. [read post]
