Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont" Results 101 - 120 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 6:44 pm
The Texas Supreme Court has further defined and expanded the Daubert requirements in the cases of E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[ Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:10 am by John L. Welch
An mp3 of the oral argument may be found here (Appeal No. 2010-1369).Appellant Citigroup argued that, in its du Pont analysis, the Board failed to properly consider a possible variation of Applicant's CAPITAL CITY BANK standard-character mark that de-emphasizes the word CAPITAL and emphasizes the term CITY BANK. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:43 am
The U.S. judgment that is frequently brought to support the proposition that a trade secret duty may be created in such a situation is E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v Christopher, 431 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1970). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 pm
Accordingly, the fourth du Pont factor weighs in favor of finding a likelihood of confusion.Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely and therefore affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Thus the second, third, and fourth du Pont factors favored opposer.As to the strength of opposer's mark SOCK IT TO ME under the fifth and sixth du Pont factors, the Board found that the mark had enjoyed a "moderate degree of commercial success:" more than 12 million pairs of socks sold between 2007 and 2017, extensive advertising, and some media coverage. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:00 pm
All of these du Pont factors weighed in Opposers' favor. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 784 F.3d 1189, 1197 (Fed. [read post]