Search for: "E Frye"
Results 101 - 120
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 3:50 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
Merrill & Kristin E. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Frye, Jon M. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:03 am
Because of this (and because of my need to find a distraction during several particularly difficult evenings of non-billable e-discovery administration work), I decided I'd try to get back into the game of legal scholarship. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Rebecca E. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Rebecca E. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:50 am
Supp. 958 (E. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
§ 6501(e)(1)(A). [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
There are no Frye challenges discussed. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
Build a courtroom and they will come. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
Frye and State Farm, C.P. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
Hernandez, E. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(not precedential) (Patently-O) BPAI’s standard of review of examiners’ rejections: Ex Parte Frye (Director's Forum) (Patently-O) Judge Rader accuses CAFC panel of ‘bias against non-technical arts’: Media Technology Licensing v The Upper Deck Co (271 Patent Blog) BPAI to HP: Equal protection clause doesn't save claims from 101: Ex parte Haines (12:01 Tuesday) District Court E D Texas: Evidence of litigation-induced license agreements should not be… [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
Bock Charles E. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Starrs, “Frye v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
Aside from its being a petitio principia, we could probably add that the reaction is emotive, uninformed, and uninformative, and that it fails to support the author’s suggestion that “Daubert has it all wrong,” and that “[w]e need a different approach. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:59 pm
Law Judge Mindy E. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(not precedential) (Patently-O) BPAI’s standard of review of examiners’ rejections: Ex Parte Frye (Director's Forum) (Patently-O) Judge Rader accuses CAFC panel of ‘bias against non-technical arts’: Media Technology Licensing v The Upper Deck Co (271 Patent Blog) BPAI to HP: Equal protection clause doesn't save claims from 101: Ex parte Haines (12:01 Tuesday) District Court E D Texas: Evidence of litigation-induced license agreements should not be… [read post]
