Search for: "E. C." Results 101 - 120 of 37,951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 4:02 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Next week, the board is expected to approve environmental clearances that would extend two light rail lines, the C Line farther south to Torrance and the E line eastward to Whittier. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:02 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- concluding that: (1) for portion of request concerning third parties, FBI properly used a Glomar response pursuant to Exemptions 6 and 7(C); (2) FBI performed adequate search for records pertaining to plaintiff’s investigation for fraud and extortion; (3) FBI properly relied on Exemption 3 to withhold grand jury records, pen register information, wiretap information, intelligence information, bank records, and export control enforcement information; and (4) government properly… [read post]
16 May 2024, 8:35 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
(B&C®) think it is The post There Is More to TSCA Reporting Than CDR: TSCA Sections 8(a), (c), (d), and (e), June 18, 2024, 11:00 a.m. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following the hearing, the arbitrator makes a nonbinding recommendation to defendant as to the appropriate penalty or whether any further action should be taken, which recommendation defendant may reverse, remand or dismiss (see 19 NYCRR 941.13 [a], [c], [d]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following the hearing, the arbitrator makes a nonbinding recommendation to defendant as to the appropriate penalty or whether any further action should be taken, which recommendation defendant may reverse, remand or dismiss (see 19 NYCRR 941.13 [a], [c], [d]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 8:00 pm by Jeanne Huang
All submissions must include contact information (name, e-mail, phone, address). [read post]
14 May 2024, 11:02 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- finding that: (1) agency failed to adequately explain its search methodology in response to request for records concerning plaintiff; and (2) agency’s Vaughn Index lacked sufficient detail to allow court to evaluate withholdings under Exemptions 6, 7(C), and 7(E); and (3) agency’s withholding claim under Exemption 5’s deliberative process privilege also lacked a sufficient basis, nor did agency meet its foreseeable harm burden.Summaries of all published… [read post]