Search for: "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. AT&T CORP."
Results 101 - 120
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm
Bonds filed multiple Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) complaints. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a report making similar allegations. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Brookings is an equal-opportunity employer that is committed to promoting a diverse and inclusive workplace. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 13-445Issue: (1) Whether the cost-causation principle underlying the “just and reasonable” standard of the Federal Power Act permits the socialization of costs across a regional transmission network without regard to the actual costs caused or benefits received by customers required to pay those costs; and (2) whether an administrative agency may concededly rely upon extra-record evidence without providing the parties notice and an… [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The case presented the Court with the question whether the failure to raise a claim before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or a state counterpart, which is required under the statute, has the effect of depriving a court of jurisdiction to hear a lawsuit premised on that claim. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Gulf Oil Corp., 597 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1979). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced Monday that the retail giant will pay more than $12 million to resolve claims that for years it denied jobs to female applicants at a distribution center in London, Ky. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
As to the first claim, the court found that plaintiffs identified a number of red flags, including coordinated complaints submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employee walkouts and protests about sexual harassment, and Congressional inquiries, indicating for pleading purposes that sexual harassment occurred at the company and supporting a reasonable inference that Defendant knew about the red flags. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
As to the first claim, the court found that plaintiffs identified a number of red flags, including coordinated complaints submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employee walkouts and protests about sexual harassment, and Congressional inquiries, indicating for pleading purposes that sexual harassment occurred at the company and supporting a reasonable inference that Defendant knew about the red flags. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Underlying ActionThe Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) brought this case in its own name pursuant to Section 706, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 9:05 am
[2] Mallard v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
In June 2009, the Federal Trade Commission commenced a civil action against, among others, the defendant, in connection with the operation of his Internet company. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
In June 2009, the Federal Trade Commission commenced a civil action against, among others, the defendant, in connection with the operation of his Internet company. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Federal Election Commission – suggesting that he may agree with the holding in that case. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 14-1375, another one-timer asking “[w]hether a dismissal of a Title VII case, based on the [EEOC’s] total failure to satisfy its pre-suit investigation, reasonable cause, and conciliation obligations, can form the basis of a[n] attorney’s fee award to the defendant”; Betterman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
Dun & Bradstreet Corp., 482 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 2007). [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm
Corp. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
