Search for: "Edwards v. Cross"
Results 101 - 120
of 637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
This piece is cross-posted at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
Moalin, on the telephony metadata program that Edward Snowden revealed in 2013. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:54 pm
Chen in San Francisco, then crossed the Bay Bridge.Judge Chen also received the Pure Sweat Basketball v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:31 am
On 11 August 2020, the Court of Appeal (CA) handed down its judgement in the case of R (on the application of Edward BRIDGES) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:29 am
In Cook v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
., Noble v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
This appeared to be a settled approach and is in line with the approach taken by Henry Carr J in Evalve v Edwards Lifesciences [2019]. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Here’s an excerpt addressing a recent SPAC-related M&A lawsuit: Consider the 2019 case of Welch v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am
One Committee member (Ruth Edwards M.P.) responded that she did not think that any element of the conspiracy theory could be categorised as ‘harmless’, because “it is threatening public confidence in the 5G roll-out” — a proposition with which the DCMS Minister Caroline Dinenage agreed. [read post]
19 May 2020, 6:38 pm
In R. v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:27 am
A comprehensive Commentary, edited by Professor Sabine Corneloup and published by Edward Elgar Publishing, was recently released providing an in-depth analysis of the Rome III Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law governing cross-border divorce and legal separation. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
.), Trade and Competition Law in the EU and Beyond, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, p. 276 ff). [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
The appeal and the cross-appeal were both allowed. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
Second-use patents are often a weak incentive because their protection is narrow and they are challenging to enforce if valid because of cross-label use. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:51 pm
In the case of Martinez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:02 am
(Travel of people is viewed as interstate "commerce," see Edwards v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Edwards, 314 Conn. 465 (2014); Washington State General Rule 37. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Today: background and level-setitng.Panel IThe Honorable Edward J. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm
There are plenty of the “big” constitutional cases, but I’ll refer to only one other in addition to the Secession Reference: the Persons Case (Edwards v. [read post]
