Search for: "Ex parte C.D."
Results 101 - 120
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/012,179 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:19 am
LEXIS 28211 (C.D. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:10 pm
LEXIS 28211 (C.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Next year, the Supreme Court’s Daubert decision will turn 20. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/012,128 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/012,128 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/012,128 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/012,095 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/012,095 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
HTC Attack on FlashPoint Image Capture Patent Among the Reexamination Requests Filed Week of Jan 9th
17 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
Patent No. 6,278,447 for video interface system (see ex parte Request No. (9)). [read post]
HTC Attack on FlashPoint Image Capture Patent Among the Reexamination Requests Filed Week of Jan 9th
17 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
Patent No. 6,278,447 for video interface system (see ex parte Request No. (9)). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
(C.D. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
This was certainly true this past week, when requests were filed against five Katz telephone system patents (see ex parte Request Nos. (1), (3) to (5) & (10)). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
This was certainly true this past week, when requests were filed against five Katz telephone system patents (see ex parte Request Nos. (1), (3) to (5) & (10)). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:21 pm
Shortly after filing its answer, which alleged in part that the '626 patent was invalid, on November 2, 2011, Bam filed a request for an ex part reexamination of the '626 patent. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:21 pm
Shortly after filing its answer, which alleged in part that the '626 patent was invalid, on November 2, 2011, Bam filed a request for an ex part reexamination of the '626 patent. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Hitachi Koki has requested reexamination of seven Milwaukee Electronic Tool patents for lithium battery packs for hand-tools (see inter partes Request Nos. (8) to (10) and ex parte Request Nos. (5) to (8)). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Hitachi Koki has requested reexamination of seven Milwaukee Electronic Tool patents for lithium battery packs for hand-tools (see inter partes Request Nos. (8) to (10) and ex parte Request Nos. (5) to (8)). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
., 418 U.S. 323, 340 (1974); Illinois ex rel. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
., 418 U.S. 323, 340 (1974); Illinois ex rel. [read post]
