Search for: "F/V "PREVAIL""
Results 101 - 120
of 3,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 10:26 am
Strange, the defendants named in the proposed complaint are subject to potential liability for Reilly's alleged discriminatory conduct either vicariously or as aiders and abettors (seeAdministrative Code § 8-107[13][a]-[b]; Priore v New York Yankees, 307 AD2d 67, 74, 761 N.Y.S.2d 608 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 504, 807 N.E.2d 894, 775 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2003]; see also Malena v Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC, 886 F Supp 2d 349, 367 [SD NY 2012]). [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm
Ozaltin, 708 F.3d 355, 377 (2d Cir.2013); Whallon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:36 am
Klinger v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
See Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
(See Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:32 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:16 am
Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., 320 F. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:06 pm
Co. of North Am., 987 F.2d 1017, 1029 (4th Cir. 1993); Hummell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
In City of Encinitas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:02 am
Oman, 924 F.2d 346, 347 (D.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:44 am
NLRB, 206 F.3d 1183, 1189 (D.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:02 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:42 am
Individual appointed to a public office does not have a right to reappointment to such public office after the individual’s term of office expiresGupta v Town of Brighton, 2nd Cir., 182 F.3d 899Is an individual entitled to be reappointed to public office upon the completion of his or her term? [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142, 1143 (9th Cir. 2010); Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:39 pm
Astrue, 773 F. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
Repsis, 73 F. 3d 982 (1995)— which in turn relied upon this Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:59 am
Dror, 112 F.3d 473, 480 (Fed. [read post]
