Search for: "FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Summers" Results 101 - 120 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The First Amendment…does not prohibit the State from insuring that the stream of commercial information flows cleanly as well as freely. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:03 am by Lyle Denniston
The decision is one of several by federal courts in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in Burwell v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
”  In no way can that standard be squared with the authority granted the Fed by Congress to supervise, regulate, suspend operations of, put into and out of receivership banks of all varieties, bank holding companies, and, in a key enlargement of authority prescribed in 2010 by the Dodd-Frank Act, of “systemically important” non-bank financial institutions like securities firms and insurance companies. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
RBC Life Insurance Company) confirming that a trial judge does not have the option of awarding a Defendant double costs in circumstances where a Plaintiff obtains a judgement at a quantum below a Defendant’s formal offer to settle. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Federal Insurance Company, as discussed here. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Federal Insurance Company, as discussed here. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:56 pm by Virginia Employment Law Letter
The employee was a social service coordinator for Integra Health Management, which coordinates healthcare coverage for insurance companies. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
Quicken Loans, Inc., in which the Court held that unearned fees – fees for which lenders do not provide any services – violate federal law only if the fees are split between two companies. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, if the federal courts decline to follow the Delaware courts’ lead, federal court merger objection litigation could remain an important corporate and securities litigation phenomenon, representing a significant litigation exposure for companies and for their D&O insurers. [read post]