Search for: "Favors v. Johnson et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
Several social science and psychological studies have noted the profound adverse effect on children who witness domestic violence, including development of post-traumatic stress disorder and other severe emotional and behavioral problems (see, e.g., Stone and Fialk, Criminalizing the Exposure of Children to Family Violence: Breaking the Cycle of Abuse, 20 Harv Women's LJ 205; Tomkins et al., The Plight of Children Who Witness Woman Battering: Psychological Knowledge and Policy… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
State Farm Lloyds, et al. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:37 am
Johnson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 10:12 am
In Patten et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:24 am
Here, in Teague, et al v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:08 am
In Patten et al. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., et al., No. 13-2559, U.S. 7th Cir. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:39 pm
More specifically, in Gurley, et al. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Travis et al., Tex. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Leslie, et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Hansmann, et al., The New Business Entities in Evolutionary Perspective [Feb. 2005]). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm
Americans for Safe Access, et al v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
WHITTINGTON, ET AL., No. 10-0316 Opinion of the Court Concurring and Dissenting This is a potentially major takings case about when government can take property for private (rather than public) benefit. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:11 pm
In Espenscheid et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:16 am
ESTATE OF ROSE NEWMAN, ET AL., App. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
Building on Markman’s “reasonable reliance” rule in Cooper, the Court of Appeals in Johnson v. [read post]
