Search for: "GIVENS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC" Results 101 - 120 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2015 WL 5173060, No. 2:14–CV–2234 (E.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm by Greg Mersol
Incidentally, this was the same court that issued the trial court decision, later decisively overruled in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm by Charles Casper
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:51 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Bouaphakeo, a case that will provide the Supreme Court with the opportunity to clarify the extent to which Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:57 am by Greg Mersol
 The Eighth Circuit, in a 2:1 decision, upheld that verdict, rejecting arguments by the employer that (1) the case should never have been certified given differences in time spent among the class; (2) the use of statistics was improper and constituted “Trial by Formula” in violation of the teachings of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that the district court fundamentally misapprehended the reach of Wal-MartStores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:55 pm by Nikki Siesel
In addition, the products have been sold through the same grocery store chains, similar mass merchants such as Wal-Mart and Target, and also the same club stores. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Both of these lawsuits, in turn, follow after the securities class action lawsuit filed in April 2013 against Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB De CV (“Walmex”) and certain of its directors and officers, in the face of corruption allegations involving its operations in Mexico. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, a supervisor’s alleged statement that that “[s]he could do more when she was younger than she can now” was a stray remark and not tied to his firing (Dominick v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., March 16, 2015, Teilborg, J.). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 That decision, issued by Judge Leonard Sand, held that because the named plaintiffs were not current employees, the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 279 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]