Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement"
Results 101 - 120
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Eligibility Challenges: Retirement Capital Access Management Company, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
On July 22, 2016, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in City of Birmingham v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 9:02 am
SFM v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:57 pm
In the case of Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:05 am
Granted 207-c benefits, he had no interest in filing a disability retirement application. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Wilner (now retired, specially assigned) and Judge Dale R. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
(See People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 6:06 am
Claimant appealed the Board's ruling. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 6:06 am
Claimant appealed the Board's ruling. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
The appellant even filed to the Board a document describing the skills required by a technically qualified member of the Board of Appeal to show to the Board that the rapporteur objected did not qualified for the function, that the conduct of the Board was a disgrace and went on with this line of mistrust reasoning.A petition for review was finally filed on the grounds of several procedural violations of the opposition division and Board of Appeal.As one… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
The appellant even filed to the Board a document describing the skills required by a technically qualified member of the Board of Appeal to show to the Board that the rapporteur objected did not qualified for the function, that the conduct of the Board was a disgrace and went on with this line of mistrust reasoning.A petition for review was finally filed on the grounds of several procedural violations of the opposition division and Board of Appeal.As one… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
The magistrate granted the Board’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Miami Beach v McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052, 1055; see World Ambulette Transp., Inc. v Lee, 161 AD3d 1028; Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 143 AD3d 487). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
In Pease v Colucci, 59 A.D.2d 233, the court said that "Section 207-a of the General Municipal Law is a remedial statute enacted for the benefit of [firefighters] and should be liberally construed in their favor. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:24 am
NAM v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:29 pm
The petitioner began having symptoms of depression, anxiety, and agoraphobia in 2002 and was granted ordinary disability retirement (ODR) in 2004. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:24 pm
In fact, paragraph 14 of the Decision reads as follows:The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in ESA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
No. 150 v. [read post]
