Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 101 - 120 of 1,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 4:05 am
Granted 207-c benefits, he had no interest in filing a disability retirement application. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Wilner (now retired, specially assigned) and Judge Dale R. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am by Guido Paola
The appellant even filed to the Board a document describing the skills required by a technically qualified member of the Board of Appeal to show to the Board that the rapporteur objected did not qualified for the function, that the conduct of the Board was a disgrace and went on with this line of mistrust reasoning.A petition for review was finally filed on the grounds of several procedural violations of the opposition division and Board of Appeal.As one… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am by Guido Paola
The appellant even filed to the Board a document describing the skills required by a technically qualified member of the Board of Appeal to show to the Board that the rapporteur objected did not qualified for the function, that the conduct of the Board was a disgrace and went on with this line of mistrust reasoning.A petition for review was finally filed on the grounds of several procedural violations of the opposition division and Board of Appeal.As one… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am by Peter Mahler
Miami Beach v McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052, 1055; see World Ambulette Transp., Inc. v Lee, 161 AD3d 1028; Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 143 AD3d 487). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In Pease v Colucci, 59 A.D.2d 233, the court said that "Section 207-a of the General Municipal Law is a remedial statute enacted for the benefit of [firefighters] and should be liberally construed in their favor. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:29 pm
The petitioner began having symptoms of depression, anxiety, and agoraphobia in 2002 and was granted ordinary disability retirement (ODR) in 2004. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:24 pm by Howard Knopf
In fact, paragraph 14 of the Decision reads as follows:The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in ESA v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 1:14 pm by Matt Cooper
Michigan In Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans v. [read post]