Search for: "Grant v. Public Works, Dept" Results 101 - 120 of 377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2008, 11:40 am
For publication opinions today (3): In Cory Pierce, Judith McIntosh, Thomas Ferrara, Judy Willis, et al v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
Co., 274 AD2d 346 [1st Dept 2000]; Yankelevitz v Royal Globe Ins. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Clarence N., 110 A.D.3d 430, 430–431, 972 N.Y.S.2d 245 [1st Dept. 2013]; Matter of Jose M. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
The Appellate Division said that Bayer failed to do so.In any event, said the court, Bayer “failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Piro's conduct was so extreme, outrageous, and beyond the bounds of human decency as to constitute the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress, citing Schell v Nassau County Dept. of Health, 237 AD2d 423.* As a general rule, public officials may claim a qualified immunity with respect to statements… [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The employee, a human resource specialist, was terminated after his employer discovered that he used his computer terminal to frequently access pornographic websites during working hours.Fraser v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.USDC, 135 F. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:06 am by Patricia Salkin
Rural Community Coalition., Inc. v Village of Bloomingburg, 2014 WL 2515973 (NYAD 3 Dept 6/5/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ny-supreme-court/1669004.html Filed under: Annexation, Current Caselaw - New York, Standing [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Auth., 182 AD3d 970, 971; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept. of Health, 159 AD3d 1250, 1252; Matter of Trotman v New York State Cts., 117 AD3d 1164, 1165; Matter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266, 1268; Matter of Cushion v Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 46 AD3d 1095, 1096; cf. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
The Appellate Division said that Bayer failed to do so.In any event, said the court, Bayer "failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Piro's conduct was so extreme, outrageous, and beyond the bounds of human decency as to constitute the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress, citing Schell v Nassau County Dept. of Health, 237 AD2d 423.The full text of the decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us]* As a general rule,… [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Savvis v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 05751, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDebra Savvis sued the New York City Department of Education to recover damages for alleged unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex and a hostile work environment in violation of New York State’s Executive Law §296. [read post]