Search for: "Griffin v. Burden"
Results 101 - 120
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
A probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons (see Matter of Griffin v MTA N.Y. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
We drew attention, however, to the very different position in England and Wales where the burden is on the defendant to prove truth. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Griffin, Jr., University of Arizona James E. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
From Reynolds v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:12 pm
Prods., Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:48 pm
Bosse murdered his girlfriend, Katrina Griffin, who was a Native American, and her two young children. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:18 am
And Iunderstand that published orders from this Court that categorically foreclose relief towhole groups of individuals, like Matchett and Griffin, may lessen that burden ondistrict courts, too. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:15 am
A trial court erroneously used a “preponderance of the evidence” standard to determine it was in the child’s best interest to change the established custodial arrangement, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled in a 2-1 decision that may create more confusion as to how to apply the burden in custody cases.In Griffin v Griffin (published opinion, Docket No. 338810), the Court of Appeals said the “key” in custody modification cases is… [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
Cuomo (2020) and Tandon v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Catalina v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 11:12 am
The post <i>Volokh v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:23 am
Hansen In Tesoro del Valle Master Homeowners Assn. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:59 pm
Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:05 pm
In Griffin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Professor Hamilton blogs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
This does not appear to be too great a burden, and helps to facilitate review on appeal. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
Jackson 208 F.3d 633,636 (7th Cir. 2000); Griffin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm
Because a party has no choice in the selection of who is examined on his behalf under Rule 7-2(5), it is arguably unfair to burden him with such a person’s answers: see Rule 7-2(5) and comments thereunder. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:02 am
In McEver v. [read post]
