Search for: "HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC."
Results 101 - 120
of 267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
The Federal Trade Commission will require Honeywell International Inc. to license patents critical to the manufacture of two-dimensional (2D) bar code scanners, under a settlement resolving FTC charges that Honeywell’s acquisition of rival scan engine manufacturer Intermec Inc. would be anticompetitive. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:49 am
Honeywell International, Inc., 706 F.3d 1351 (Fed. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Honeywell, Inc., 140 F.3d 1449, 1454 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm
Honeywell Int'l, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
Allied Corporation was succeeded by AlliedSignal, Inc., and later by Honeywell International, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:45 am
Honeywell, No. 11–0085, 2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
Honeywell International, Inc.,75 So. 3d 1024 (Miss. 2011), a decision allowing a non-MPLA claim to proceed against the designer of a car seatbelt made by someone else, the court concluded there was room for a common law negligent misrepresentation claim against a non-manufacturer. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm
Other members on the BPC Energy Board included high-ranking representative from: Marathon Oil Corporation; Exxon Mobil Corporation; Honeywell International, Inc.; Booz Allen Hamilton; Anadarko Petroleum Corporation; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; Exelon Corporation; Arkansas Public Service Commission; Sandia National Laboratories; DuPont; American Council on Renewable Energy; BNSF Railway Company; … [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:12 pm
David Cote, Chairman and CEO of Honeywell International, Inc., and Chair of BRT's Energy and Environment Committee said, "America's energy economy is firing on all cylinders -- efficiency, renewable power, oil and gas production, and advanced coal and nuclear power technology. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
Honeywell International, Inc. the Federal Circuit reviewed a district court’s denial of declaratory judgment jurisdiction for a case involving two suppliers of an automotive coolant. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
Electronics had 2 patents out of the 47, Thomas Licensing S.A. held 4, Bharat Heavy Electrical Held 2, Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc., held 3, Research in Motion Limited held 3 and the others, such as, Samsung, AIIMS, Saint-Gobain, Fujiflims, Honeywell, Bayer, BP Chemicals Limite A British Company, The Secretary, Ministry Of Information, Technology, The Trustees Of Princeton University, PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. and Honda Motors held one patent each. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:55 pm
The problem for Honeywell here is that this Court concluded in Arkema Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Defendant: Hamilton Sensors Inc., Gerardi Construction Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 10:57 am
In Honeywell International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:55 am
See Honeywell International, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:12 am
The workers sued Triplex, Inc., the company that had sold the hose to Honeywell, under the theory that it was liable for their injuries as the manufacturer of the hose. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:05 am
Honeywell on July 12 (Case C 616/10). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
The plaintiff must show “strong cause” that the case is exceptional and that the forum selection clause should not be enforced: Expedition Helicopters Inc v Honeywell Inc., 2010 ONSC 351, at para. 11. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:46 am
Honeywell International Inc.34. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
On May 14, 2012, the Chicago law firm of Power Rogers & Smith filed 25 Complaints at Law against Midwest Air Traffic Control, Honeywell International, Inc., Hamilton Sunstrand Corporation, Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. and the Boeing Company. [read post]
