Search for: "Hair v. U.s.*" Results 101 - 120 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
  Until then, follow the advice of the sages over at LaDonna’s Hair and Art Studio in Simsbury, Connecticut, and “Spend Some Time on YOU! [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:41 am by SHG
  As Tony Mauro succinctly sums up hundreds of pages of opinions, nail buffing, hair tinting, tooth straightening, new clothing and a full body massage: In the post-Enron case of Skilling v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:52 pm
With $3.3 million in alleged damages against a Chapter 7 debtor at stake, in Ackerman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am by Schachtman
March 18, 2011)(excluding expert witness who relied upon MSDS to support a claim of a severe allergic reaction to Clairol hair dye; the MSDS did not address human reactions or consumer exposure levels) STATE DECISIONS REJECTING RELIANCE UPON MSDS OHIO Braglin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:45 am by Will Aitchison
The protective gear at issue included hair and beard nets, safety glasses, ear plugs, and “bump caps. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
  The Court faced  very similar question (hair length) recently in a case with a far cooler caption, Iron Thunderhorse v. [read post]