Search for: "Harmon v. Givens"
Results 101 - 120
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm
In Youngblood v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:10 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Ana Loloei & Allyson B. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:32 pm
Our next case to discuss in The Gerson Company v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
Polk v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:18 pm
In the instant matter, given the conclusive evidence of abuse provided by the DNA test results, the State’s need to subject Shernise to a highly intrusive physical examination is so diminished as to render the search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:42 am
Cases T‑604/11 and T‑292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM is a decision of the EU General Court concerning two sets of opposition proceedings brought by Diset SA against two Community trade mark applications of Mega Brands (creator of Mega Bloks, the long-time Lego rival) based on a Spanish national registration. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 9:45 pm
The Tunnel Inc., 3 USPQ2d 1446 (CA 2 1987), and Larry Harmon Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:21 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:09 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Accepting Nassau's construction of the Ordinance would render the provisions concerning an employee's "initial employment date" superfluous and, citing Universal Metal & Ore, Inc. v Westchester County Solid Waste Commission, 145 AD3d 46, said "[C]ourts must give effect to the wording of a statute without rejecting any words as superfluous, and must harmonize related provisions in a way that renders them compatible;"c. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:25 am
Part V looks at the way these jurisdictions do interact on the temporal axis of history, that is, their actual influence on each other, which in the relevant jurisdictions currently takes the form of regulatory competition and legislative harmonization. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:44 am
More from our authors: Harmonizing European Copyright Law. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:16 am
More from our authors: Harmonizing European Copyright Law. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In Gomez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 3:04 pm
Arizona courts have a responsibility to attempt to harmonize all of this state's relevant statutes. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
He has published widely and has given numerous lectures on enterprise law and corporate governance. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
That case establishes provisions of a contract should be harmonized and given effect if possible. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:03 pm
We must strive to harmonize all of the deed’s parts, construing the deed to give effect to all of its provisions. [read post]
