Search for: "Harris v. United States et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
He quoted extensively from the Missouri case of Eyerman et al v Mercantile Trust Co. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
VISUAL HEALTH AND SURGICAL CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation, ANTONIO BOLET, individually, Et. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm
Patrick Ifediba, et al., Case No. 2:18-cr-00103-RDP-JEO, Doc. 1 (N.D. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
FEC and Vermont Right to Life Committee, et al v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm
Cir. 2017);SmithKline, 439 F.3d at 1320; Harris Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
United States Issue: Whether Harris v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:50 am
Wofford, et al v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Rev. 835-889 (2010).ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
Adoption Law in Turkey and the United States. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:27 pm
In Jones et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
HARRY M. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
