Search for: "Hatch v Hatch"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2010, 9:07 pm
July 19-20, 2010 - Hatch-Waxman Boot Camp*** (American Conference Institute) - Boston, MA July 21, 2010 - "Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:31 pm
The Federal Circuit brought some measure of clarity to the question recently when it affirmed a District Court dismissal of an ANDA action on improper venue grounds, in Celgene Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:59 pm
Of course, the Federal Circuit explained this week in the Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:31 pm
The Federal Circuit brought some measure of clarity to the question recently when it affirmed a District Court dismissal of an ANDA action on improper venue grounds, in Celgene Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:12 pm
§§ 1292(a)(1)and (c)(1).(...)Our interpretation is consistent with the SupremeCourt’s decision in Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:05 am
In Martin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- Earlier this month, the Federal Circuit affirmed a District Court judgment of obviousness in ANDA litigation under the Hatch Waxman Act having a long provenance of earlier litigation, in Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- The Hatch Waxman statute created a safe-harbor provision, found at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:10 am
GSK v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 8:46 am
In the recent case (Hatch v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm
At a hearing this past June, I urged the House Oversight Committee to amend the Hatch Act to prohibit partisan political activity by high ranking Administration officials. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 7:42 am
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) will deliver a keynote speech. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 9:59 pm
This ANDA litigation arose over Defendants' attempt to obtain regulatory approval under the Hatch-Waxman... [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- In Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:18 pm
§ 271(e)(1) was the occasion for the Federal Circuit to illustrate the continued debate over the scope of the safe harbor enacted as part of the Hatch-Waxman Act in Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:40 am
Cardozo School of Law) On March 25, 2013, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:12 pm
People v Gomez, 65 NY2d 9, 10-12; People v Mooney, 62 AD3d 725; People v Robinson, 16 AD3d 768, 769-770, lv denied 4 NY3d 856). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 8:49 pm
Lupin and AstraZeneca v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:58 pm
Lupin and AstraZeneca v. [read post]
