Search for: "Hendricks v. AT" Results 101 - 120 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2007, 11:55 pm
Supreme Court in Kansas v Hendricks because it does not link an individual's mental illness to his dangerousness. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:37 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today’s roundup brings more on Supreme Court case Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 5:38 am
Jon Murray of the Indianapolis Star reports today on yesterday's Supreme Court ruling in Jeffrey Voss v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:53 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:00 pm
In Hendricks, however, the Kansas statute required that all of the elements of the past sexually violent conduct be established beyond a reasonable doubt, and thus Hendricks does not stand for the proposition that the application of a lower standard of proof for those retrospective factual determinations is proper. [read post]
25 May 2007, 5:57 am
As noted here on May 15th, on May 22nd, the Indiana Court of Appeals was scheduled to hear oral argument in David Schlotman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
Indianapolis Star columnist Dan Carpenter has an important column today on the Indiana Supreme Court's Feb. 22nd decision in the case of Lambert v. [read post]