Search for: "Hill v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
After a four-week absence, they return to these pages, this time in DCP Sand Hills Pipeline, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 8:24 am by Jared Green
Apple Therapy of Londonderry, LLC and the Supreme Court accepted the plaintiff’s appeal under Superior Court Rule 46(c). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:19 am by Larry
The judges upheld a lower court's denial of a request by Budd Larner in Short Hills to pay its $159,100 lien out of its client's interest in the home, which was the couple's principal asset in Pernini v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] In other words, when non-licensees act as agents they are also required to act as officers of the court (even if they may not actually be officers, as suggested by Justice Hill in R. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
 For that reason, the Court has often stood with the least popular in our society and, since Marbury v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:12 pm
Messick, 2002 PA Super 117, 799 A.2d 793, 798 (Pa.Super. 2002); see also Bird Hill Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One petition for certiorari was filed on 9/12/22: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:42 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, February 12, 2014:New Ontario Superior Court Judges appointed B.C. liquor officials probe claims Rob Ford was served drinks after hoursSupreme Court of Canada ruling on life support has wider impact: Hassan Rasouli | Science Codex Heenan Blaikie’s junior associates may not be so lucky Dean Harry Arthurs on Legal Education and a ReplyOhio same-sex couples sue to list both parents on birth… [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 3:05 pm by Daniel F. Freedman
The Los Angeles Superior Court’s decision in the case, Yes In My Back Yard, Sonja Trauss, and Janet Jha v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:57 am
The Court of Appeals reversed in an unpublished memorandum decision, Hill v. [read post]
Tyler Hill Corp., 566 F .3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 2009) (forum selection clause which provided for venue and trial “in Nassau County, New York” excluded federal jurisdiction where no federal court was located in Nassau County); Redwood Hill Farm & Creamery, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:15 am by Shahram Miri
Such is the exact scenario of a recent court case originating from Contra Costa County Superior Court, Case # MSP0900615. [read post]