Search for: "Hughes v. Young" Results 101 - 120 of 187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
Fast-forward to five years later to a lecture theater in Gower Street in London where Professor Hugh Hansen of Fordham Law School is making his closing remarks in the 5th Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture on the "Culture of the Public Domain". [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
See, for example, Arland v Taylor, [1955] OR 131 (CA); R v Cinous, [2002] 2 SCR 3; and R v Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852. 13. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
” “I believe young gentlemen frequently do, sir. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
Sometimes, it’s the personality’s own social media activities that can ignite the flames of controversy, such as a young Disney star undermining her carefully cultivated family friendly image with ill-timed “selfies” on Twitter or Instagram, or NFL star Rashard Mendenhall’s controversial tweets about Osama Bin Laden and 9/11 (more on that later). [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:36 am by Ron Coleman
The WSJ Law Blog is less bothered: Hugh Young of the Product Liability Advisory Council, one of the organizations that cited the study, says the footnote is “peculiar,” but adds, “I wouldn’t take it as a slap in the face. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:18 am by emagraken
What he must show is that the type or kind of injury was reasonably foreseeable:  Hughes v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 4:11 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Henry V has three scenes that are saturated with legalism in warfare, both jus ad bellum and jus in bello. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm by Sam Murrant
Also of interest here is this post by Hugh Tomlinson QC, who disagrees with Chakrabarti and points out that she has been misrepresented (she did not, in fact, say that the Leveson proposals, if enacted, would be illegal or incompatible with the HRA). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
  As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]