Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 7 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW"
Results 101 - 120
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The appellate court observed that the MMP was not a mitigation measure, but was an practice of the Association independent of the sheriff’s rodeo. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Complaint Allegations and Trial Court Ruling Complaint The six causes of action in the complaint bundled together routine CEQA allegations with CESA and other resource law allegations. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
The Government also contends that the Law School Evidence may be admissible for purposes of impeachment under Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
I § 7), the President decides when and how it is spent, and recently, whether it will be spent at all. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Noriega—a University of California, Berkeley School of Law-educated founding partner in the law firm of Arias, Abrego, Lopez & Noriega—learned of the bogus article, with its potentially negative impact on his international business law practice, he retained Benjamin Chew, of the Patton Boggs law firm in Washington, DC, to have it removed. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
7. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
71 (7). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Canada (Public Works & Government Services), 2003 FCA 301. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
The Commission also drafted a new Model Rule on Practice Pending Admission and made amendments to the Model Rule on Admission by Motion. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
United States and In re Winship. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm
He is the President and Managing Partner of The Health Law Firm, which has a national practice. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
In addition, the bill amends current law and requires that the jury be specifically instructed, before trial and before recesses, on the prohibition of research or dissemination of information, in all forms including electronic and wireless. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
In addition, the bill amends current law and requires that the jury be specifically instructed, before trial and before recesses, on the prohibition of research or dissemination of information, in all forms including electronic and wireless. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court, voting 5-4 along ideological lines, has ruled that strip-searches of people arrested for minor offenses does not violate the Fourth Amendment principle against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 135 governs proceedings at the USPTO between applications. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
The Commission has looked and issued papers about multi-jurisdictional practice, rules revisions, outside ownership of law firms, admission by motion, chioce of conflicts law, and other cutting edge issues. 7. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
A mature law of evidence governs admissibility of evidence, and what is reserved to counsel’s argument and the trier of fact’s reasonable inference. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division.Bankruptcy -- Adversary proceedings -- Florida Consumer Collections Practices Act -- Jurisdiction -- Abstention -- It is appropriate to deny request to dismiss or abstain from hearing adversary proceeding brought by chapter 7 trustee for related bankruptcy case to recover damages for benefit of debtor's estate, based on alleged violations of Florida Consumer Collections Practices Act -- Because adversary… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
As Confrontation Clause mavens already know, Beauchamp raises the question whether the Sixth Amendment prohibits the admission of unconfronted testimonial dying declarations. [read post]
