Search for: "IN RE RICHARD C."
Results 101 - 120
of 1,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Côte D’Azur; b. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
The underpinning of many modern standing decisions, argues Professor Richard Re, is the "most interested plaintiff rule. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
It then draws on this examination to re-cast the project of human rights legalities as a semiotic contestation—a system of interpenetration centered in law but structurally coupled with globalization and governance. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Now former-Dean Ward Farnsworth, who generated the idea and then elicited the willing cooperation of one of the truly most remarkable people in the worldwide legal academy, Richard Albert. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
Congratulations to Richard Samp, Harriet Hageman, and Mark Chenoweth of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, who represent plaintiff. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
This is sufficient for the appeal to be allowed, to set aside the order for a new trial for the respondent Richard Doxtator and to restore his conviction for first degree murder. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
In In re Dolly Varden Chocolate Co., decided in 1924, the Court reiterated that “the words ‘Merrie Christmas’ [do] not to constitute a valid technical trade-mark for ribbon. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:56 pm
This should be one of the many “additional factors” considered by the Department of Labor and specifically listed in the final rule in 29 C.F.R. section 795.110(b)(7). c. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
” In the process, she re-transcribed and reinterpreted sources on the community of Palmares that had often been cited from flawed printed trascriptions. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
[Bowies were regulated like other knives; knives were sometimes regulated like handguns] This post describes and analyzes nineteenth century state statutes on Bowie knives. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
This article lays out high-level priorities in Biden’s and Trump’s NSSs and analyzes how the two administrations talk about the issues, paying close attention to how they’re aligned and where they differ. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:14 am
”‘ “The diocese’s main attorney, Richard Trenk, filed on Oct. 21 to bring on Cole Schotz as special counsel to defend him during a court-directed deposition. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm
Michael C. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
” José de Córdoba and Ingrid Arnesen report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
That is a special reason to be grateful to Richard, who is truly a bridge both between countries and continents, but also between generations. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
Many companies have utilized a process such as IC Diagnostics (TM), which restructures, re-documents, and/or re-implements independent contractor relationships in order to minimize risk of misclassification liability in a customized and sustained manner, without altering the company’s business strategy or objectives. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
Materially, clause 3 provides as follows: “3 Interpretation of the Convention rights … (2) A court determining a question which has arisen in connection with a Convention right – (a) must have particular regard to the text of the Convention right, and in interpreting the text may have regard to the preparatory work of the Convention; (b) may have regard to the development under the common law of any right… [read post]
