Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC" Results 101 - 120 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 9:15 pm by lawmrh
Supreme Court ruled against Arizona’s total ban on lawyer advertising because it violated the free speech guarantee of the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
The recent Supreme Court decision in Yukon Francophone School Board, Education Area #23 v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  The Queen of England continues to be our official figure-head of state. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:30 am by Emma Snell
He faces a mandatory life sentence. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 1:13 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
However shameful the failure to update the waiting period for registry is, even worse is the 1996 law that created mandatory detention of immigrants without benefit of appointed counsel, as Prof. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:07 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
We wrote an op-ed sort of critiquing the Kentucky Supreme Court’s approach to the bar exam, and a sitting Kentucky Supreme Court Justice wrote a 1000 word op-ed in which he personally called us out. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court case changed the standard municipal governments must meet when bringing Fair Housing Act cases against banks for allegedly discriminatory lending practices. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
”A centerpiece of Dean Martinez’s plan to better educate students (as well as, perhaps, staff) about “freedom of speech [at Stanford] and the norms of the legal profession” is a mandatory half-day educational programming before the end of the current academic year. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Victoria Clark
.: The Heritage Foundation will host a two-panel discussion titled Scholars and Scribes Review the Rulings: The Supreme Court’s 2017-2018 Term. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
A Despite the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in a recent defamation case, Crookes v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
California Supreme Court’s context-based definition in Nike v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:00 am by Victoria Clark
A Closer Look at Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Courts and regulatory agencies continue to scrutinize non-competes and other restrictive covenants. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:42 am by Victoria Clark
Manfred Nielson, deputy supreme allied commander of transformation at NATO, on Driving NATO’s Military Transformation Agenda Forward. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:38 am by azatty
If re-elected, I would address these issues as follows: Petition the Supreme Court to decrease Bar dues. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:40 am by privacylawyer
The first is that it gives the government the power to dictate potentially huge changes or mandatory elements of an online service. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Supreme Court challenging the Commerce Department’s decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. [read post]